mykeystrokes.com

"Do or Do not. There is no try."

“The Nuance Of Climate Change Denialism”: No Differences When It Comes To What Government Should Do…Nothing

Recently Jeb Bush said this:

“The climate is changing. I don’t think the science is clear on what percentage is man-made and what percentage is natural. It’s convoluted,” he told roughly 150 people at a house party here Wednesday night. “And for the people to say the science is decided on this is just really arrogant, to be honest with you. It’s this intellectual arrogance that now you can’t have a conversation about it even.”

So he’s embraced the scientific fact that the climate is changing. We can’t really accuse him of being a true climate change denier.

I would also suggest that he’s right…the science isn’t clear about the exact percentage of climate change that is man-made and how much is natural. But from there, what he has to say is one hot mess. He makes the subtle suggestion that those who prioritize dealing with climate change are saying that the science is decided on how much is man-made and how much is natural. That’s a complete straw man that doesn’t exist, but he feels the need to call “arrogant.”

What the science actually says is that human beings are having a major impact on climate change. Anyone who doesn’t accept that is in denial.

When it comes to the 2016 Republican candidates, Sen. Marco Rubio occupies what might be called their own particular brand of “mushy middle” on climate change denialism.

Humans are not responsible for climate change in the way some of these people out there are trying to make us believe, for the following reason: I believe the climate is changing because there’s never been a moment where the climate is not changing. The question is, what percentage of that … is due to human activity?

He too accepts that the climate is changing (because it’s always changing). But apparently he thinks it’s an open question whether or not human activity has any impact at all.

For flat-out denialism, the prize goes to Sen. Ted Cruz.

“The last 15 years, there has been no recorded warming. Contrary to all the theories that – that they are expounding, there should have been warming over the last 15 years. It hasn’t happened,” said Cruz…

When pressed about the fact that the arctic is melting, and whether that helps prove climate change is real, Cruz dismissed it.

“Other parts are going up. It is not – you know, you always have to be worried about something that is considered a so-called scientific theory that fits every scenario. Climate change, as they have defined it, can never be disproved, because whether it gets hotter or whether it gets colder, whatever happens, they’ll say, well, it’s changing, so it proves our theory,” argued Cruz.

There you have it folks, a rare moment of nuanced disagreement between three Republican candidates for president. But never fear, they dispense with all of those differences when it comes to the question of what government should do about climate change…nothing.

 

By: Nancy LeTourneau, Political Animal Blog, The Washington Monthly, May 23, 2015

May 24, 2015 - Posted by | Climate Change, Climate Change Deniers, GOP Presidential Candidates | , , , ,

3 Comments »

  1. […] “The Nuance Of Climate Change Denialism”: No Differences When It Comes To What Governmen… […]

    Like

    Pingback by Thank-You for Making Your Broken Bird World — davidbiddle.net | May 25, 2015 | Reply

  2. Americans should not vote for any candidate who does not see climate change as the problem it is.

    Like

    Comment by btg5885 | May 24, 2015 | Reply

  3. I’m no scientist or doctor, but I think these guys are idiots.

    Like

    Comment by Barneysday | May 24, 2015 | Reply


Share your comment