"Do or Do not. There is no try."

“Fulfilling Their Constitutional Duties”: On SCOTUS, Pressure Falls On Endangered GOP Senators

All corners of the Republican Party have made themselves very clear: they intend to, in Donald Trump’s words, “delay, delay, delay” the confirmation of Antonin Scalia’s replacement on the Supreme Court until after the 2016 election. Ted Cruz has signaled his intention to lead a blockade, and Mitch McConnell intends to run a blockade.

All of this would be unprecedented, despite conservative protestations to the contrary. Conventional wisdom seems to suggest that McConnell can hold the Supreme Court nomination hostage for the whole year. But is that true?

It’s not necessary for the entire GOP to confirm the nominee. It only requires a few GOP Senators to join with the Democrats to fulfill their Constitutional duties. And as it turns out, there are quite a few Republican Senators in blue states who would be pilloried as intransigent obstructionists if they refused to confirm commonsense consensus nominees.

Among these Senators would be Senator Mark Kirk in Illinois, who is already Democrats’ primary target for a Senate takeover. Wisconsin’s Ron Johnson is less ideologically likely to cross the aisle, but with Russ Feingold already seeming likely to defeat him in November, it’s not clear that Johnson can afford to give Democrats yet another cudgel with which to attack him. The same goes for Senator Kelly Ayotte in New Hampshire, Pat Toomey in Pennsylvania and Rob Portman in Ohio.

President Obama will certainly nominate a number of popular, reasonable and consensus nominees, from recently confirmed Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson to D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Sri Srinivasan. With each attempted and withdrawn nomination the Republican Party would look worse as a whole, but the careers of the specifically imperiled Senators would be particularly threatened–and with them the Republican Senate majority itself.

Will Ayotte, Kirk and their colleagues kowtow to McConnell and Cruz and likely eliminate their ability to hold their seats, or will they do the right thing, perform their constitutional duty and protect their Senate careers?

Time will tell.


By: David Atkins, Political Animal Blog, The Washington Monthly, February 14, 2016

February 14, 2016 - Posted by | GOP, Mitch Mc Connell, Senate Republicans, U. S. Supreme Court | , , , , , , , , , , ,


  1. I think a few of these doomed GOP senators will still join the efforts to keep blocking the nomination – it’s likely that even if they lose, they’ll run for something again in the future, and they probably would want to avoid getting a party traitor label.


    Comment by List of X | February 14, 2016 | Reply

    • Unfortunately, I think you’re right..


      Comment by raemd95 | February 14, 2016 | Reply

  2. They may want to reconsider this. If Trump wins the nomination, the GOP may lose the senate majority and the presidency. McConnell’s best time to barter may be right now. Plus, a series of 4-4 votes into next year is not justice and is a waste of taxpayer money as well as other attorneys and their clients. Trump’s statement is exactly what he has been on a tirade against – Washington politics. So, he is not in office and he is touting Washington politics. I find that interestingly hypocritical.


    Comment by Keith | February 14, 2016 | Reply

    • You’re exactly right. Also, I am especially concerned about 4-4 decisions. Those in no way signify equal justice.


      Comment by raemd95 | February 14, 2016 | Reply

Share your comment

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: