"Do or Do not. There is no try."

“The Second Coming”: Women Don’t See GOP’s War On Contraceptives As About Religion

Some Republicans thought the fight over birth control coverage would cost President Obama the election. Instead, it may have unleashed a second coming of the Anita Hill controversy, alienating women who otherwise might be attracted to a fiscally conservative, small government message.

The Obama administration looked weak at first when the Catholic Church balked at regulations requiring religious-affiliated institutions such as universities and hospitals to cover birth control  under  their employees’ health insurance. The White House had not lined up women to  defend birth control as a critical part of preventive healthcare, so the chaste church elders dominated the dialogue, presenting it as an issue of religious liberty. The idea that women had the liberty, as well, to decline the rules offered by the church—particularly in cases where the female employees  did not practice Catholicism—took longer to emerge.

But now, lawmakers at the state and federal level (along  with  presidential candidates) are continuing to hammer away at the issue, and it’s a dangerous game. The Senate today voted down a bill that would allow any employer to deny healthcare coverage of anything if it violates his or her  moral principles, a standard so broad it invalidates any federal health insurance standards (which may well be the point). Even if the law were limited to religious teachings only, what would prevent  a business owner who is a Jehovah’s Witness from denying coverage of  transfusions? Or a Christian Scientist from denying coverage of any kind of medicine at all?

As if on script, supporters of the bill say, “It’s not about contraception,” and it is this repeated comment that stands to get them into the most trouble with female voters. If you’re not of the gender that can  get pregnant, you have the luxury of seeing the issue as theological. If you stand to lose control over your life and future because you can’t prevent yourself from becoming pregnant, it is indeed all about contraception. The lecture sounds particularly annoying to a  woman when it is being made by men, as has largely been the case on the moral exception bill. It’s the same as when male lawmakers were so utterly baffled and skeptical when Anita Hill told a  story of sexual  harassment that has been shared by so many, many other women.

Virginia state lawmakers took it even further, considering a bill that would have required women to have ultrasound exams before getting an abortion. Many women found the whole basis of the bill to be fairly insulting, since it suggested that women really have no idea what goes on in their bodies and need to be schooled about it before having an  abortion. That could be the only reason a woman would seek an abortion, the thinking went—she simply was too simple or ignorant to know what  she was doing. But the mostly male lawmakers knew.

Except that they didn’t. Remarkably, in seeking to teach women about their own bodies, they hadn’t done much learning on their own. They did  not know that the jelly-on-the-belly sonogram that makes for such touching  scenes in movies is not done in the first trimester of pregnancy (when the vast  majority of abortions are performed) because the pregnancy hasn’t developed  enough at that point to see anything. Women at that stage of pregnancy must  undergo a “transvaginal probe,” an invasive procedure. The phrase itself made some lawmakers so  uncomfortable that they didn’t want it uttered aloud during debate, so as not to offend the young pages. The bill was watered down  somewhat, so that women would not have to endure a procedure critics described as  state-sponsored rape. But the guts of the bill passed the state Senate and are making their way to the governor, who will sign it.

The contraception legislation may well do what it was intended to do—shore up the  social conservative base of the Republican party and convince some people that Obama or Democrats are antireligion and pro big government. But  proponents also risk energizing a group of women who long ago earned the right to control the size and timing of their families. For those women, it is,  indeed, all about contraception.


By: Susan Milligan, U. S. News and World Report, March 1, 2012



March 1, 2012 - Posted by | Abortion, Women's Health | , , , , , , ,

No comments yet.

Share your comment

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: