mykeystrokes.com

"Do or Do not. There is no try."

“Hate In A Neat Little Package”: When You Defend Phil Robertson, Here’s What You’re Really Defending

Let’s get a few things straight about what Phil Robertson said that got him in trouble.

Defenses of Robertson, the star of “Duck Dynasty” suspended for his remarks in an interview with GQ, have focused on the idea that he was just crudely expressing the sincere, Christian view that homosexuality is sinful.

Condemnation of Robertson therefore amounts to condemnation of views that are part of Christian doctrine. What are Christians to do about the fact that their beliefs require them to condemn homosexual acts? Why are cultural elites oppressing Christians by making it forbidden to express their views?

Robertson’s defenders should read his comments again, because their defenses are off-point. If you’re defending Robertson, here’s what you’re defending:

  1. Robertson thinks black Americans were treated just fine in the Jim Crow-era South, and that they were happy there. “I never, with my eyes, saw the mistreatment of any black person. Not once. Where we lived was all farmers. The blacks worked for the farmers. I hoed cotton with them. I’m with the blacks, because we’re white trash. We’re going across the field…. They’re singing and happy. I never heard one of them, one black person, say, ‘I tell you what: These doggone white people’—not a word!… Pre-entitlement, pre-welfare, you say: Were they happy? They were godly; they were happy; no one was singing the blues.”
  2. Robertson thinks the Japanese bombed Pearl Harbor because they didn’t believe in Jesus. “All you have to do is look at any society where there is no Jesus. I’ll give you four: Nazis, no Jesus. Look at their record. Uh, Shintos? They started this thing in Pearl Harbor. Any Jesus among them? None. Communists? None. Islamists? Zero. That’s eighty years of ideologies that have popped up where no Jesus was allowed among those four groups. Just look at the records as far as murder goes among those four groups.”
  3. Robertson hates gay people. Robertson in 2010: “Women with women, men with men, they committed indecent acts with one another, and they received in themselves the due penalty for their perversions. They’re full of murder, envy, strife, hatred. They are insolent, arrogant, God-haters. They are heartless, they are faithless, they are senseless, they are ruthless. They invent ways of doing evil.”

This last one is key. My inbox is full of “love the sinner, hate the sin” defenses of Robertson’s 2013 remarks. But Robertson doesn’t love gay people. He thinks they’re, well, “full of murder.” His views on gays are hateful, inasmuch as they are full of hate.

As a side note, it’s remarkable how often these things come as a package. Robertson’s sincere doctrinal view about the sinfulness of homosexuality comes packaged with animus toward gays and retrograde views about blacks and non-Christians. It’s almost as though social conservatism is primarily fueled by a desire to protect the privileges of what was once a straight, white Christian in-group, rather than by sincere religious convictions.

You might recall that conservatives are currently trying to figure out what to do about the fact that the Republican Party performs quite poorly with the growing share of voters who are not white, straight Christians. They think some of it has to do with economic issues. But then they’re scratching their heads, trying to figure out how Mitt Romney lost the Asian American vote 3-to-1 even though, by Republican “maker-vs.-taker” metrics, Asian Americans are disproportionately likely to be “makers.”

Non-whites and non-Christians and gays keep getting the sense that, even setting aside policy, conservatives and Republicans just don’t care for them. The “Duck Dynasty” episode, with Ted Cruz and others rushing out to defend Robertson’s honor, is just another example of why.

 

By: Josh Barro, Business Insider, December 21, 2013

December 23, 2013 - Posted by | Bigotry, Racism | , , , , , , ,

1 Comment »

  1. To those that think its Phil Robertson’s right to believe the bible that was attacked I offer this.

    It’s not his right to believe in the bible that is at issue even Satan believes, it’s his lack of understanding that Scripture was written in various historically differing cultural context’s and has been thoughout the centuries interpreted into many translations through the eyes and the culture, bias, prejudices of the translators. The original languages provided choices in the interpretive process and those choices determined the message told. Even it God wanted us to judge others sincerity and walk with the lord, which i am certain he doesn’t want, we should at least before condemning an entire Christian and non-Christian minority be absolutely certain of our Absolutism, be certain of what scripture was really addressing within the culture at the time it was written and its effects this culture had on the Church that required being pointed out. But thousands of years of tradition, discrimination, demonizing and assuming can harden the heart, Jesus clearly addressed this occurrence in his statement to the self-righteous religious leaders that interpreted scripture much differently than Jesus that you cannot put new wine in old wine skins because the rigidity and lack of flexibility of the latter would bring certain rupture. Clearly we must remove the veils of tradition and shallow prejudiced teachings from our eyes, minds, hearts and soften our spirits and revisit Gods word with him leading the way, maybe if we pray hard enough for truth rather than justification we will find what God wants us too or at least discover we aren’t so sure any more of our conclusions and must trust the Lord and embrace Grace, Mercy and Love. His twisted out of context use of Scripture to attribute perverted behavior, elicit fear and hate towards the Gay community is shameful and anything but Christian.

    Like

    Comment by Michael Pedicini | December 23, 2013 | Reply


Share your comment

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: