mykeystrokes.com

"Do or Do not. There is no try."

Only Conservatives Can End The Death Penalty

Every so often, one capital case makes a public spectacle of the American machinery of death. Last week, it was the controversy over Troy Davis, who was executed in Georgia after years of impassioned argument, organizing and litigation.

I honor those who worked so hard to save Davis’s life because they forced the nation to deal with the  imperfections and, in some instances, brutalities of the criminal justice system.

Yet after all the tears are shed, the repeal of capital punishment is still a political question. Can the politics of this question change? The answer is plainly yes.

It’s hard to imagine now, but in 1966, more Americans opposed the death penalty than supported it — by 47 percent to 42 percent. But the crime wave that began in the late 1960s and the sense that the criminal justice system was untrustworthy sent support for capital punishment soaring. By 1994, 80 percent of Americans said they favored the death penalty, and only 16 percent were opposed.

Since then, the numbers have softened slightly. Over the past decade, the proportion of Americans declaring themselves against capital punishment has hovered around 25 to 32 percent. The mild resurgence of opposition — caused by a decline in violent crime and by investigations raising doubts about the guilt of some death-row prisoners — has opened up political space for action.

Liberals are not going to lead this fight. Too many Democratic politicians remember how the death penalty was used in campaigns during the 1980s and ’90s, notably by George H.W. Bush against Michael Dukakis in 1988. They’re still petrified of looking “soft” on crime.

Moreover, winning this battle will require converting Americans who are not liberals. The good news is that many are open to persuasion. Gallup polling shows that support for capital punishment drops sharply when respondents are offered the alternative of “life imprisonment, with absolutely no possibility of parole.” When Gallup presented this option in its 2010 survey, only 49 percent chose the death penalty; 46 percent preferred life without parole.

And a survey last year for the Death Penalty Information Center by Lake Research Partners showed that if a variety of alternatives were offered (including life without parole plus restitution to victims’ families), respondents’ hard support for the death penalty was driven down to 33 percent.

If a majority is open to persuasion, the best persuaders will be conservatives, particularly religious conservatives and abortion opponents, who have moral objections to the state-sanctioned taking of life or see the grave moral hazard involved in the risk of executing an innocent person.

Despite the cheering for executions at a recent GOP debate, there are still conservatives who are standing up against the death penalty. In Ohio this summer, state Rep. Terry Blair, a Republican and a staunch foe of abortion, declared flatly: “I don’t think we have any business in taking another person’s life, even for what we call a legal purpose or what we might refer to as a justified purpose.”

Last week, Don Heller, who wrote the 1978 ballot initiative that reinstated the death penalty in California, explained in the Los Angeles Daily News why he had changed his mind. “Life without parole protects public safety better than a death sentence,” he wrote. “It’s a lot cheaper, it keeps dangerous men and women locked up forever, and mistakes can be fixed.”

The most moving testimony against Troy Davis’s execution came from a group of former corrections officials who, as they wrote, “have had direct involvement in executions.”

“No one has the right to ask a public servant to take on a lifelong sentence of nagging doubt, and for some of us, shame and guilt,” they said. “Should our justice system be causing so much harm to so many people when there is an alternative?”

Political ideology has built a thick wall that blocks us from acknowledging that some of the choices we face are tragic. Perhaps we can make an exception in this case and have a quiet conversation about whether our death-penalty system really speaks for our best selves. And I thank those conservatives, right-to-lifers, libertarians and prison officials who, more than anyone else, might make such a dialogue possible.

By: E. J. Dionne, Opinion Writer, The Washington Post, September 25, 2011

September 27, 2011 Posted by | Equal Rights, GOP, Ideologues, Ideology, Justice, Politics, Racism, Republicans, Right Wing, Teaparty | , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Lynch Law Lives On Stage And In Troy Davis Execution

When  you visit Atlanta, ask about the death of Troy Davis, an execution by  lethal injection as miles of people across land and sea kept a vigil until it  came to pass at 11:08 p.m. last Wednesday evening.

Nice  to know law and order—or do I mean lynch law and  order?—prevails in the  stubborn deep South, whatever the world thinks.  Davis was put to death despite  a slew of supporters, including  dignitaries and law enforcement experts, who  found shades of reasonable  doubt in his murder case.

In  a stroke of amazing timing and relevance, Georgia’s capital city is the setting  of a tragical musical, Parade,  based on a true story of a 1915 lynching.  I just saw the brilliant  production on opening night at Ford’s Theatre on 10th Street here in Washington—the very  spot where Abraham Lincoln was shot at close  range, by someone he never  saw coming in the dark. A vengeful son of the South,  an actor, played a  Shakespearean scene for all he was worth—MacBeth, Lincoln’s favorite.

On  that tragic April night, Lincoln was heartily enjoying a comedy. Similarly, all  seems bright at first in this Ford’s Theatre play. Parade’s exuberant  ensemble  charms with spring songs, costumes, and revelry as the curtain  opens on  Atlanta’s celebration of “Confederate Memorial Day” in April  1913.  But the holiday itself reveals the defiance of Atlanta’s white  society, keeping  the anti-Yankee candles burning.

The  theatre director, Paul R. Tetreault, expertly captures the  tableau of a wounded  world that tells itself, over and over, that it  was never vanquished, despite  the festering sore of the Recent  Unpleasantness.

An  old guard culture, hostile to outsiders, was the downfall for a  Jewish New  Yorker in his early 30s, Leo Frank, who made a good living  as a factory superintendent.  He was accused and arrested of a gruesome  child murder. Playwright Alfred Uhry,  author of Driving Miss Daisy, wrote  the book for the Broadway play,  launched onstage in 1998. Uhry has  family ties to the story, in true Southern  storytelling style. There  are no secrets down there, except the ones they  choose to tell years  later.

Parade is no picnic as it wends its way through the Southern   justice system on a murder case that became a national cause, like the  Davis  case. Frank was found guilty of fatally strangling a girl worker  in his pencil  factory. When he was sentenced to hang, there was an  outcry from quarters who  felt a virulent strain of anti-Yankee  anti-Semitism played a part in the  verdict.

The  governor of Georgia a century ago, John Slaton, went against the  will of  Atlanta’s townspeople. His character, portrayed by Stephen F.  Schmidt, exhibits  courage and pathos, clear about the consequences of  bucking the establishment. Governor  Slaton reviews the conflicting  evidence in Frank’s case and grants him  clemency: life imprisonment  instead of death by the state’s hand. That is  precisely what Georgia  state officials refused to do for Troy Davis.

Lead  actor Euan Morton telegraphs Frank’s desperate plight with  impressive  restraint. Jenny Fellner, the actress who plays his wife  Lucille, sparkles  onstage with her singing voice and her journey to  loving her husband, locked up  and alone, more than she ever did.

Relentlessly,  the end closes in. A well-connected mob of white men  break into the jail where  Frank is held, to take him for a long night  ride. It was a well-planned thing.  In the show as in life, the hooded  men string Frank up—as he prays in Hebrew—and hang him, with picture  postcards to show for it all. Very nice.

So  if you get to Marietta, ask them about the tree where Frank was  hanged. Yes,  Georgia has lots of colorful local history, and the fun  part is trying to see  where the past ends and the present begins. Both  the Davis and Frank  convictions were reviewed by the U.S. Supreme  Court, which denied relief or  mercy in both cases. Oliver Wendell  Holmes, the famous justice, scolded Georgia  for what he called a form  of “lynch law” in Frank’s trial. But he was  a damn Yankee in the  minority.

Tetreault  and others chose this timely tale to inaugurate The Lincoln Legacy Project,  an initiative to spark a national dialogue on overcoming violence based on hate  or bigotry. Parade’s history  lesson could not be more sobering. Early in  the 20th century,  lynchings of black men were at an all-time high in the  Southern states  (including Maryland.)  This was a spur to the founding of  the National  Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) in 1909.  Ari  Roth of Theater J, a partner in co-producing the play, notes Frank met  the  same fate as so many black men at the hands of mobs. Parade, Roth  said,  is a “galvanizing reminder of what can go wrong in our country  when hate  speech and raging angers aren’t tempered and set to rest.”

Amen.  And let the conversation begin.

By: Jamie Stiehm, U. S. News and World Report, September 26, 2011

September 27, 2011 Posted by | Bigotry, Human Rights, Justice, Politics, Racism, Right Wing, States | , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

   

%d bloggers like this: