mykeystrokes.com

"Do or Do not. There is no try."

Mitt Romney: Goldman Sachs Guy

Mitt says he’s “not a Wall Street guy.” But in one key way, he’s pure Wall Street.

“I am not a Wall Street guy, classically defined,” said Mitt Romney in a December interview with the Huffington Post. Private equity firm Bain Capital, Romney’s longtime employer and the company that made him rich, he seemed to say, was a different breed from JPMorgan Chase, Goldman Sachs, and the other Wall Street financial titans. It was as if he was distancing himself from the unpopular Wall Streeters who helped cause the 2008 economic collapse.

But in one key way, Romney is pure Wall Street. A review of his personal financial disclosure records shows that a chunk of Romney’s wealth—he’s worth an estimated $190 million to $250 million—comes from investments in an array of Wall Street banks and investment houses, none more so than Goldman Sachs.

Romney and his wife, Ann, have investments in nearly three-dozen various Goldman funds together valued at between $17.7 million to $50.5 million, according to a financial disclosure form (PDF) filed in August 2011. Those investments appear in the blind trusts and individual retirement accounts belonging to the Romneys. Romney’s been a loyal Goldman Sachs client. His 2007 disclosure, filed before his first presidential run, showed Goldman investments valued at between $18.2 million and $51.5 million.

No other Republican presidential candidate comes to close to matching the size and breadth of Romney’s investment portfolio. Nor do any of the other candidates’ personal financial disclosures list any investments in Goldman-run funds. Romney’s big bet on Goldman’s financial wizardry could give more ammo to his critics who attack him as a out-of-touch corporate elite who profited by flipping companies and laying off workers, and who has little in common with average Americans. (A Romney spokeswoman did not respond to a request for comment.)

Goldman Sachs is considered by many one of the villains of the 2008 financial crisis. In 2010, Rolling Stone‘s Matt Taibbi acidly described Goldman as “a great vampire squid wrapped around the face of humanity, relentlessly jamming its blood funnel into anything that smells like money.” After a lengthy investigation into the firm’s activities, Sen. Carl Levin (D-Mich.) accused Goldman last year of deceiving its clients by selling them complex investments that the firm’s own traders predicted would fail—a charge Goldman vehemently denied. Levin also accused Goldman brass of misleading Congress about its trading activities, referring the matter to the Justice Department and the Securities and Exchange Commission.

The Goldman investments in Romney’s 2011 disclosure are spread across a variety of portfolios and investment funds. A private, Goldman-managed stock portfolio in Mitt Romney’s blind trust worth between $1,000,001 and $5,000,000 contains stock holdings in 32 companies, including Bank of America, McDonald’s, Staples, and Occidental Petroleum. Another Goldman fund, also worth between $1,000,001 and $5,000,000, invests in (PDF) everything from junk bonds to US Treasuries, derivatives to futures, foreign currencies to the government housing corporation Fannie Mae.

Here’s a list of the Romneys’ most recent Goldman investments:

 

Investment Lowrange Highrange Holder Type
GS Financial Square Federal Fund – FST Shares $5,000,001 $25,000,000 Mitt IRA
GS Private Client Portfolio $1,000,001 $5,000,000 Mitt Blind trust
GS Strategic Income Fund Class 1 $1,000,001 $5,000,000 Mitt Blind trust
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Class 1 $500,001 $1,000,000 Mitt Blind trust
GS Financial Square Federal Fund – FST Shares $1,000,000 $1,000,000 Ann Blind trust
The Goldman Sachs Group Inc. Linked to GP GSCI Agriculture, structured note $500,001 $1,000,000 Ann Blind trust
Goldman Sachs Trust GS Inflation Protected Securities Funds – INSTL SHS $1,000,000 $1,000,000 Ann Blind trust
The Goldman Sachs Group Inc. Linked to MSCI EAFE Structured Note $500,001 $1,000,000 Ann Blind trust
GS Local Emerging Mkts Debt FD Mutual Fund $500,001 $1,000,000 Ann Blind trust
GS Strategic Income Fund CL 1 $500,001 $1,000,000 Ann Blind trust
The Goldman Sachs Group Inc Linked to DJIA Structured Note $500,001 $1,000,000 Ann Blind trust
The Goldman Sachs Group Inc Linked to DJIA Structured Note $500,001 $1,000,000 Ann Blind trust
GS 2002 Exchange Place Fund LP $1,000,000 $1,000,000 Ann Blind trust
GS Capital Partners Fund 2000 LP $500,001 $1,000,000 Ann Blind trust
Goldman Sachs Global Opportunities Fund LLC $1,000,000 $1,000,000 Ann Blind trust
Goldman Sachs Hedge Fund Partners LLC $1,000,000 $1,000,000 Ann Blind trust
Goldman Sachs Hedge Fund Partners II LLC $1,000,000 $1,000,000 Ann Blind trust
Goldman Sachs Trust GS Inflation Protected Securities Fund – INSTL SHS $250,001 $500,000 Mitt Blind trust
The Goldman Sachs Group Inc Linked to Russell 2000 Index Structured Note $250,001 $500,000 Ann Blind trust
Cash – GS Account $100,001 $250,000 Ann Blind trust
Cash – GS Account $50,001 $100,000 Mitt Blind trust
GS Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund LLC $50,001 $100,000 Mitt Blind trust
GS Capital Partners III LP $15,001 $50,000 Ann Blind trust
GS Financial Square Federal Fund – FST Shares $1,001 $15,000 Ann IRA
Goldman Sachs Core Fixed-Inc Mutual Fund $1,001 $15,000 Ann IRA
The Goldman Sachs Group CMN (Sold) $0 $1,001 Mitt Blind trust
Goldman Sachs Investment Grade Credit Fund – Inst (Sold) $0 $1,001 Mitt Blind trust
GS Global Equity Partners I, LLC (Sold) $0 $1,001 Mitt Blind trust
Cash – GS Account $0 $1,001 Mitt IRA
Goldman Sachs Ultra-Short Duration Government FD (Sold) $0 $1,001 Mitt IRA
Goldman Sachs Short Duration Government FD (Sold) $0 $1,001 Mitt IRA

 

Here’s a list of Goldman investments in Romney’s 2007 disclosure:

 

Investment Lowrange Highrange Holder Type
Goldman Sachs Financial Square (Sold) $0 $1,001 Mitt Blind trust
Goldman Sachs Institutional LI (Sold) $0 $1,001 Mitt Blind trust
Goldman Sachs Bank Deposit $500,000 $1,000,000 Mitt Blind trust
Goldman Sachs Emerging Equity Fund $1,000,001 $5,000,000 Mitt Blind trust
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc $1,000,001 $5,000,000 Mitt Blind trust
Goldman Sachs Struct Intl Equity Fund $1,000,001 $5,000,000 Mitt Blind trust
GS Global Equity Partners $1,000,001 $5,000,000 Mitt Blind trust
The Goldman Sachs Group Inc 0% 9/25/08 (Sold) $0 $1,001 Mitt Blind trust
The Goldman Sachs Group Inc 0% Due 12/11/2009 (Sold) $0 $1,001 Mitt Blind trust
The Goldman Sachs Group Inc 0% Due 3/25/10 $250,001 $500,000 Mitt Blind trust
GS Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund, LLC $1,000,001 $5,000,000 Mitt Blind trust
Goldman Sachs Global Strategic Energy Fund, LLC $1,000,001 $5,000,000 Mitt Blind trust
Goldman Sachs GTAA Fund, LCC $1,000,001 $5,000,000 Mitt Blind trust
Goldman Sachs Financial Square Federal Fund $1,000,000 $1,000,000 Ann Blind trust
Goldman Sachs Intl Real Estate Secs Fund $1,000,000 $1,000,000 Ann Blind trust
GS 2002 Exchange Place Fund LP $1,000,000 $1,000,000 Ann Blind trust
GS Global Opportunities, LLC $1,000,000 $1,000,000 Ann Blind trust
GS Direct Strategies Fund LLC $1,000,000 $1,000,000 Ann Blind trust
GS Hedge Fund Partners II LLC $1,000,000 $1,000,000 Ann Blind trust
GS Hedge Fund Partners LLC $1,000,000 $1,000,000 Ann Blind trust
GS Quant and Active Direct Strategies Fund, LLC $1,000,000 $1,000,000 Ann Blind trust
GS Capital Partners Fund 2000, LP $1,000,000 $1,000,000 Ann Blind trust
GS Capital Partners III LP $100,101 $250,000 Ann Blind trust
Goldman Sachs Financial Square Federal Fund $1,000,001 $5,000,000 Mitt IRA
Goldman Sachs Emerging Markets Equity Fund $250,001 $500,000 Mitt IRA
GS Structured US Equity Institutional $100,101 $250,000 Mitt IRA
Goldman Sachs Japanese Equity Fund $0 $1,001 Mitt IRA
Goldman Sachs Financial Square Federal Fund $0 $1,001 Ann IRA
Goldman Sachs Core Fixed-Inc I Mutual Fund $1,001 $15,000 Ann IRA

Romney has grappled with accusations in both of his presidential bids that he’s a lifelong member of the wealthy elite who can’t relate to blue-collar Americans. Romney has recently compounded his 1-percent problem by claiming that $374,000 in speaking fees is “not very much,” betting Rick Perry $10,000 during a nationally televised debate, and revealing that he pays roughly 15 percent in taxes. (A typical middle class family pays closer to 25 percent.)

Larry Sabato, director of the University of Virginia’s Center for Politics, says that while Romney isn’t the first very wealthy man to run for president (think John F. Kennedy and Franklin Delano Roosevelt), one of Romney’s basic problems is connecting with middle-class Americans. His many investments in Goldman could shape voters’ opinions of Romney. “The massive Goldman holdings would be another bit of the Romney mosaic,” Sabato says. “It’s another reason why Romney has to find ways to better connect with average people’s problems—because he doesn’t have any of the same problems on his plate.”

 

By: Andy Kroll, Mother Jones, January 23, 2012

January 24, 2012 Posted by | Election 2012, GOP Presidential Candidates | , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Newt Gingrich Used Gimmick To Avoid Paying Taxes On Millions In Income

Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich (R) caused a stir during last week’s Republican presidential primary debate when he released his 2010 tax return and revealed that he had paid a 31.5 percent tax rate on $3.14 million in income. The release came amid widespread calls for Gingrich’s fellow candidate, former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney (R), to release his own tax returns, after Romney admitted his tax rate was about 15 percent.

But further scrutiny of Gingrich’s own returns from tax experts has revealed that his tax rate should have been even higher. That’s because, according to Forbes, Gingrich dodged “tens of thousands of dollars in Medicare payroll taxes” by classifying most of his income from two companies he owns as profits and dividends, therefore avoiding the payroll tax — a technique the IRS has “consistently and successfully attacked” in the past. Newt and Callista Gingrich classified only $444,327 of their income from Gingrich Holdings and Gingrich Productions as ordinary income. Meanwhile, the other $2.4 million earned was classified as profits or dividends, meaning it was not subject to payroll taxes.

According to tax experts interviewed by Forbes, that means Gingrich is dodging taxes he likely should be paying:

It appears that he is not paying his fair share of Medicare tax,’’ Robert E. McKenzie, a partner in the Chicago law firm of Arnstein & Lehr LLP concluded, in an email to Forbes, after reviewing Gingrich’s 2010 tax return. McKenzie, a past chairman of the Employment Tax Committee of the American Bar Association Tax Section and a member of the IRS’ Advisory Council, added:  “There are a multitude of cases where the IRS has successfully challenged the improper tax strategy of this candidate and his accountants. Service businesses are only allowed to distribute a fair return on investment from an S corp. as profits exempt from Medicare taxes. The remainder of profits must be paid as salary subject to a 2.9% Medicare tax levy.”

As Forbes notes, the IRS has specific rules on how payments from a small business like Gingrich Holdings should be treated for tax purposes, and the amount Gingrich says he invested in his companies — between $500,000 and $1 million — is likely “far too little” to “justify booking $2.4 million as profit.” The ploy, however, is used widely. According to the Government Accountability Office, S corps. like Gingrich Holdings underpaid wages by $24 billion in 2003 and 2004, allowing owners to avoid payroll taxes.

Gingrich’s dodge of Medicare taxes, though, pales in comparison to the tax break he’d give himself should he get to the White House. His tax reform plan calls for a flat 15 percent tax rate, slashing his effective rate to 14.6 percent and giving himself a $540,000 tax break in the process.

By: Travis Waldron, Think Progress, January 23, 2011

January 24, 2012 Posted by | Election 2012, GOP Presidential Candidates | , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Newt Gingrich And South Carolina Were Made For Each Other

Hot-headed South Carolina and former House Speaker Newt Gingrich are made for each  other. The state first to secede from the Union about 150 years ago remains  defiant, mischievous, and unreconstructed. Not all states are created  equal.

South Carolina, shall we say, made its name early as the   troublemaker. To this day, it doesn’t like to fall in line and sends   elected representatives to Washington cut from that cloth. Down home in   Charleston, men especially still brag on the firing on Fort Sumter, the  shots and  blockade that started the Civil War. Very nice.

So natch Newt Gingrich won the South Carolina Republican   presidential primary over the front-runner, former Gov. Mitt Romney. There was no  way  the most viciously verbose and confrontational politician in our  time was not going to win over the weekend. Just like the  confident, beautiful people of the  New England Patriots were going to  see their football team beat the sincere,  scrappy Baltimore Ravens, any  which way. Gingrich’s victory was destined  by the order of the  political court.

The  243,398 Republicans who voted for Gingrich in the Palmetto State  gave him the  first statewide win of his life. Remember, the former  speaker only ever  faced voters in a congressional district in Georgia.  He is not necessarily a  man of the people, no matter what the South  Carolina verdict. Not that I care,  but Romney does not need to fear the  writing on the wall yet.

Gingrich,  like his new best friend state, is an outsider of the  establishment. Gingrich,  like South Carolina, home to the the Citadel,  likes starting the political  equivalent of war, although he never did  military service. Gingrich, like South  Carolina, is steeped in history  which each are capable of entirely misreading  and handing down like  lore.

A  few facts on Gingrich’s own history. As House speaker, he was awed by  President  Clinton’s political prowess and brilliance, as Washington Post associate editor David Maraniss pointed out on Sunday’s Post  op-ed page. He  knew he had met more than his match. Later in Clinton’s  presidency, he  masterminded the House impeachment strategy, carried  out by then-Rep. Henry  Hyde, that nearly doomed Clinton’s fate. The  Monica Lewinsky affair was only a  vehicle. No moral umbrage was  involved, as we now know Gingrich was then having  an affair with an  aide on the Hill, now his third wife Callista Gingrich.

Vengeful  hypocrisy still cuts deep. If Gingrich had his way, Clinton would be as gone as  the good King Duncan in Macbeth.  Sen. Lindsay Graham, then a South  Carolina congressman, was one of  Hyde’s dozen helpers. This was only over a  dozen years ago, but it  seems like “history” we have forgotten.  That’s what Gingrich is  counting on when he talks about God’s forgiveness and  “despicable”  debate queries. That’s what columnists forget when  they write that  Whitewater prosecutor Kenneth Starr was solely responsible for  the  whole tragic circus.

Some  more history on South Carolina. When the greats gathered in a  room to invent  the Republic and its rules, South Carolina’s men were  most adamant about  protecting slavery as an institution. That was  formative fruit on the tree  since. A  South Carolina  congressman caned a Massachusetts senator for his abolitionist  views on  the Senate floor before the Civil War broke out. As noted, they were first to fight  “the Yankees” and call  themselves another country. Over much of the 20th  century, the stubborn  Strom Thurmond of South Carolina made an  indelible mark as an  arch-segregationist, a senator, and a presidential candidate.  Former Sen.  Ernest Hollings, the bright and capable junior senator  with the low country in  his voice, was thankfully a reminder of the  good men and women from that state.

The  Confederate flag has flown over South Carolina for too long. Not  only up  in the air but in the hearts of men. Gingrich won in a state  that is, in  a sense, another country.

 

By: Jamie Stiehm, U. S. News and World Report, January 23, 2012

January 24, 2012 Posted by | GOP Presidential Candidates | , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Newt Gingrich: “So Busy Serving His Country That He Had To Cheat The Government To Save The Government”

While candidate Gingrich has been busy focusing on the tax return failings of his opponent, Governor Mitt Romney, a report by Forbes’ Janet Novack suggests that, once again, Newt may be using a good offense to keep from having to play some serious defense when it comes to his own failure to pay up on his tax obligations.

According to Novack, “Newt Gingrich avoided tens of thousands of dollars in Medicare payroll taxes in 2010 by using a technique the Internal Revenue Service has consistently and successfully attacked.”

Gingrich’s primary source of income, as revealed on the one tax return he has disclosed, comes from two “S” corporations owned by Newt and his wife, Callista. S Corporations are employed as a means to allow money to ‘flow through’ to the shareholder-owner as if it were a sole proprietorship or partnership, thus avoiding taxation at both the corporate level and re-taxation at the personal level.

It is a perfectly kosher way to do business.

However, according to the law, such corporations are supposed to pay out most of its earnings as direct payments to the owner/shareholder rather than as profits or dividends which are exempted from certain tax obligations— such as the 2.9 percent of earnings which are to be paid to Medicare.

As stated on the IRS website

Reasonable Compensation

S corporations must pay reasonable compensation to a shareholder-employee in return for services that the employee provides to the corporation before non-wage distributions may be made to the shareholder-employee. The amount of reasonable compensation will never exceed the amount received by the shareholder either directly or indirectly.

Distributions and other payments by an S corporation to a corporate officer must be treated as wages to the extent the amounts are reasonable compensation for the service rendered to the corporation.

The key to establishing reasonable compensation is determining what the shareholder-employee did for the S corporation. As such, we need to look to the source of the S corporation’s gross receipts.

The three major sources are:

1. Services of shareholder,

2. Services of non-shareholder employees, or

3. Capital and equipment.

There is little question that the revenues flowing through Gingrich’s companies are the direct result of the services provided by Newt and his wife, whether by way of speaking fees, book royalties, film productions, etc. Thus, it would be reasonable to expect that the preponderance of revenue coming into the Gingrich corporations would pass through directly to Mr. and Mrs. Gingrich and be subject to taxes such as the Medicare tax.

Yet, in 2010, the Gingrich corporations paid out $444, 327 as salary to Newt and Callista while reporting some $2.4 million as profit or dividends – thus allowing the Gingrichs to avoid paying the 2.9 percent Medicare tax on the bulk of their earnings.

Of course, now that Gingrich is running for president, it is unlikely the IRS will come after him as he would simply call it an attack by the Obama administration.

And while there will, no doubt, be an agreement between Romney and Gingrich not to ‘go there’ – as both are now likely to be vulnerable on their respective tax returns—expect Rick Santorum to make a fuss unless he too turns out have some tax issues.

Personally, I can’t wait to hear Newt find a way to blame this on the media.

Or maybe he’ll tell us that he was so busy serving his country that he had to cheat the government in order to save the government.

 

By: Rick Ungar, Contributing Writer, The Policy Page, Forbes, January 23, 2012

January 24, 2012 Posted by | Election 2012, GOP Presidential Candidates | , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

The Roots Of Bain Capital In El Salvador’s Civil War

A significant portion of the seed money that created Mitt Romney’s private equity firm, Bain Capital, was provided by wealthy oligarchs from El Salvador, including members of a family with a relative who allegedly financed rightist groups that used death squads during the country’s bloody civil war in the 1980s

Bain, the source of Romney’s fabulous personal wealth, has been the subject of recent attacks in the Republican primary over allegations that Romney and the firm behaved like, in Rick Perry’s words, “vulture capitalists.”One TV spot denounced Romney for relying on “foreign seed money from Latin America” but did not say where the money came from. In fact, Romney recruited as investors wealthy Central Americans who were seeking a safe haven for their capital during a tumultuous and violent period in the region.

Like so much about Bain, which is known for secrecy and has been dubbed a “black box,” all the names of the investors who put up the money for the initial fund in 1984 are not known. Much of what we do know was first reported by the Boston Globe in 1994 when Romney ran for U.S. Senate against Ted Kennedy.

In 1984, Romney had been tapped by his boss at Bain & Co, a consulting firm, to create a spin-off venture capital fund, Bain Capital.

A Costa Rica-born Bain official named Harry Strachan invited friends and former clients in Central America to a presentation about the fund with Romney in Miami. The group was impressed and “signed up for 20% of the fund,” according to Strachan’s memoir. That was about $6.5 million, according to the Globe. Bain partners themselves were putting up half the money, according to Strachan. Thus the Central American investors had contributed 40 percent of the outside capital.

Back in 1984, wealthy Salvadoran families were looking for safe investments as violence and upheaval engulfed the country. The war, which pitted leftist guerrillas against a right-wing government backed by the Reagan administration, ultimately left over 70,000 people dead in the tiny nation before a peace deal was brokered by the United Nations in 1992. The vast majority of violence, a UN truth commission later found, was committed by rightist death squads and the military, which received U.S. training and $6 billion in military and economic aid. The Reagan administration feared that El Salvador could become a foothold for Communists in Central America.

The notorious death squads were financed by members of the Salvadoran oligarchy and had close links to the country’s military. The death squads kidnapped, tortured, and killed suspected leftists in urban areas fueling an insurgency that retreated to rural areas and waged war on the government from the countryside. The war, which lasted 12 years, triggered an exodus that brought more than 1 million Salvadorans to the United States.

There is no evidence that any of Bain Capital’s original investors were involved in these sorts of activities. But the identities of some of the investors remain secret, and there are family names that raise questions.

Four members of the de Sola family were among the original Bain investors, or “limited partners” in the company, the Globe reported. Their relative and “one-time business partner,” Orlando de Sola, was an important figure in El Salvador. A well-known right-wing coffee grower with an (in his words) “authoritarian” vision for the country, de Sola spent time living in Miami but was also a founding member of the right-wing Arena party, lead by a U.S.-trained former intelligence officer named Roberto D’Aubuisson.

Craig Pyes, an investigative reporter then with the Albuquerque Journal, wrote a series on the rightist death squads based on extensive on-the-ground reporting in El Salvador in the early 1980s with Laurie Becklund of the Los Angeles Times, while the death squads were still active.

Pyes, who has since won two Pulitzer Prizes and is now a private investigator in California, says that no one has produced any proof that de Sola directly funded death squads.

“However,” Pyes says, “he was in the inner circle of the group around D’Aubuisson at the time that D’Aubuisson was well known to be involved in the death squads. De Sola’s name appears in a December 1983 FBI cable as one of 29 people suspected by State Department officials of furnishing funds and weapons to Salvadoran death squads.”

De Sola’s name also turned up in a notebook, seized from an aide to D’Aubuisson named Saravia, that detailed the finances of D’Aubuisson’s terrorist network, according to Pyes.

The Saravia notebook, reviewed by U.S. officials, listed weapons purchases, payments, and what appear to be descriptions of violent plots by rightists, including the assassination of El Salvador’s Archbishop Oscar Arnulfo Romero in 1980. Asked about the notebook by the New York Times in the late 1980s, de Sola denied that he had ever helped finance political violence. De Sola could not be reached for comment for this story.

Romney, for his part, who was much more accessible to the press in 1994, told the Globe that year that “we investigated the individuals’ integrity and looked for any obvious signs of illegal activity and problems in their background, and found none. We did not investigate in-laws and relatives.” He also said that Bain had checked the names of the Bain investors with the U.S. government. Given the policy of the Reagan administration at the time, though, it’s not clear going to the government would have been the most effective vetting mechanism.

It’s impossible to fully explore the backgrounds of the original Bain investors because we don’t know all their identities, including the names of the four members of the de Sola family mentioned by the Globe. Neither the Romney camp, Bain Capital, nor Strachan — the Bain executive who recruited the Central Americans — responded to requests for comment.

During his first presidential bid in 2007, Romney more than once touted the Central American investors in Bain while trying to woo Hispanic voters. In a speech in March of that year to the Miami-Dade Lincoln Day Dinner, Romney actually specified five of the original “partners” in Bain Capital — but the de Sola family was not among those he named.

And that August he told the Miami Herald, “The investments for the company that I started, Bain Capital, came largely from Latin America. My largest single investors came from El Salvador, Ecuador, Colombia and Guatemala. And so I feel a deep kinship to people in Latin America.”

 

By: Justin Elliott, Salon, January 20, 2012

January 23, 2012 Posted by | Election 2012, GOP Presidential Candidates | , , , , , , | Leave a comment