"Do or Do not. There is no try."

“What Bernie Sanders’s Rise Means For American Politics”: Candidacy Will Leave Behind Policy Markers And Arguments About The Future

The exhaustive and exhausting analysis of the Fox News debate promises to produce days more of Trump-mania. It’s thus an excellent time to ponder the other big surprise of the 2016 campaign: the Democrats’ extended Weekend at Bernie’s.

No one is more amazed about the buoyancy of his presidential candidacy than Bernie Sanders himself, which only adds to its charm. The Vermont independent and proud democratic socialist got into the race mainly to remind the country what a progressive agenda actually looks like. You can’t keep calling President Obama a socialist once you are confronted with the real thing.

Then magic struck: Sanders started surging in the polls in Iowa and New Hampshire, two states that are demographically well set up for him and that also happen to hold next year’s first two contests. A poll this week from WMUR-TV in New Hampshire showed Sanders within 6 points of Hillary Clinton. The survey had a relatively small sample size and a rather large margin of error, but the trend it measured is consistent with other polls.

To paraphrase the late Robert Bork, the Sanders candidacy is a political analyst’s feast because it allows everyone to peddle his or her favorite preconceptions.

Conservatives point to his strength as proof positive of how left-wing the Democrats have become. Clinton’s critics cite his rise as a product of her weaknesses. Progressives argue that Bernie taps into a deep frustration with inequality and the power of big money in politics while also reflecting the public’s interest in bold proposals to correct both. And those who go for big sociological theories link Sanders and Trump as avatars of a populist rebellion rooted in widespread impatience with the system and traditional politicians.

Let’s begin with a caveat: Bernie is for real, and his authentic authenticity is enchanting. But it’s not clear how big his candidacy will get. He is drawing large and boisterous crowds, but he is still not close to threatening Clinton in the national polls, partly because he hasn’t broken through among African Americans and Latinos. They matter in the states that vote after Iowa and New Hampshire. This week’s NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll showed Clinton with a 59 percent to 25 percent lead over Sanders nationally. Clinton’s share was down 16 points from June while Sanders was up 10 points. But a 34-point lead is still a 34-point lead.

Is Sanders’s ascent about Clinton’s problems? The evidence is mixed. In the WMUR poll, 73 percent of New Hampshire Democrats had a favorable view of Clinton; Sanders’s favorability was at 69 percent. A fair share of Bernie’s people like Hillary, too.

But when asked about specific personal qualities, the poll’s respondents presented Clinton with a to-do list. Clinton was far ahead of Sanders as a strong leader, as having the best chance of winning in November and as having the right experience to be president. But Sanders led as the most likable and most progressive. And when asked who was the “least honest,” 31 percent picked Clinton; only 3 percent picked Sanders. Washington punditry exaggerates Clinton’s problems, but her campaign should not underestimate them.

The ideological claims are more complicated. It’s true that Democrats — and not only Democrats — are far more aggressive in their opposition to economic inequality than they were, say, in the 1990s. But that’s because the problems of inequality, blocked mobility and wage stagnation are now more severe. And anybody who doubts that the super rich have gained even more power in the political system isn’t following the super PAC news. Sanders is marshaling these discontents.

On the other hand, Democrats have not changed nearly as much ideologically as conservatives claim. In 2008, according to numbers the Pew Research Center ran at my request, 34 percent of Democrats called themselves liberal, 37 percent called themselves moderate, and 24 percent called themselves conservative. In 2015, 41 percent were liberal, 35 percent were moderate, and 21 percent were conservative. Is there an uptick in Democratic liberalism? Yes. Has the party shifted sharply leftward? No.

As for alienation from the system, Trump and Sanders do speak to a disaffection that currently roils most of the world’s democracies. But their way of doing it is so radically different — Sanders resolutely programmatic, Trump all about feelings, affect and showmanship — that they cannot easily be subsumed as part of the same phenomenon. Sanders’s candidacy will leave behind policy markers and arguments about the future. Trump’s legacy will be almost entirely about himself, which is probably fine with him.


By: E. J. Dionne, Jr., Opinion Writer, The Washington Post, August 5, 2015

August 7, 2015 - Posted by | Bernie Sanders, Hillary Clinton, Progressives | , , , , , ,


  1. Either Clinton or Sanders need to talk about Asset Based Community Development as well as infrastructure investment and solar energy development. All three of these investments pay huge dividends in places that need it most and they create jobs. ABCD can take advantage of historical tax credits in states and, if offered, federally. This is taking a run down asset and repurposing it. The solar train is moving faster as the cost declines and tax incentives sundowning. There are 170,000 solar energy jobs at year-end 2014 and jobs are growing at a double digit rate. And, we must invest in our infrastructure as it is falling apart.


    Comment by btg5885 | August 8, 2015 | Reply

  2. I don’t mind if Bernie sanders wins over Hillary, as long as we are assured he can win the national. I cannot imagine what will happen to the country if all 3 branches of the government are in Republicans’ hands.

    What I’m worried about also is that Hillary may inadvertently promise so many things to keep up with Bernie Sanders. Free college for all,free housing , etc, etc. etc.. With so many freebies, I won’t be surprised the rate of illegal immigration will reach the point of deluvian proportion.

    I’m also not understanding why Bernie Sanders is even in a Democratic Primary. He’s Independent, isn’t he ? Or is he a Democrat now ? Of course, the Republicans will love to see him run as an Independent, just in case he doesn’t win the Primary. I can even see that scenario happening. I can even see the Left boycotting the national elections if Hillary’s the candidate.


    Comment by renxkyoko | August 7, 2015 | Reply

    • I think Bernie Sanders is putting front and center many issues that need to be at least debated, many of which are central to poor and low income, average workers and the middle class. Issues of social injustice, voting rights and inequality, none of which were discussed by anyone in the GOP debate last evening. I think his presence and run is good for Democrats in fashioning their national agenda. Unlike Trump, I do not see him as divisive nor do I believe he would run as a third party candidate. Democrats boycotting Hillary if she is the nominee is self destructive. I think first of the Supreme Court appointments that will surely come up during the next Presidential term, not to mention, voting rights and women’s rights. This is why people need to make sure they vote in ALL elections, local, state and Congressional, not just the Presidential Elections.


      Comment by raemd95 | August 7, 2015 | Reply

      • Yes,people need to vote in all elections. During the last Congressional elections, our precinct was like a graveyard. The Democratic candidate almost lost . Good thing we are in California. Even if the Republicans voted in full force, their number wasn’t enough to defeat the Dem candidate. It proved we couldn’t afford to be complacent, though.

        It’s amazing there’s no Republican politician who stands for social justice….. they cannot even pretend they also care for the masses. Well, to their credit, they are at least honest. . I am an immigrant myself, non- white and poor. I know exactly whom to vote for,


        Comment by renxkyoko | August 8, 2015

      • I wish more young people would follow your example. Continue keeping yourself informed and never give up!


        Comment by raemd95 | August 8, 2015

Share your comment

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: